GeForce GT 640M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
When choosing between GeForce GT 640M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 640M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GT 640M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 640M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 640M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 134% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 640M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 640M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - with Turing.
- GeForce GT 640M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 6200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 850% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 1014% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 640M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 216% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce GT 640M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 1400% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 573% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 1114% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 437% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 2250% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1400% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 7−8 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1820% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 70% more, than GeForce GT 640M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 640M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
Code name | N13P-GS | TU117 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | no data |
Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 645 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |