GeForce GTS 160M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
When choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTS 160M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 25% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 30 MHz higher, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6600% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 692% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 786% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTS 160M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
| Architecture | G9x | Turing |
| Code name | N10E-GS1 | TU117 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | no data |
| Pipelines | 64 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 505 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 19 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Gigaflops | 288 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| Check Price |