GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 880M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and GeForce GTX 880M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and GeForce GTX 880M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce GTX 880M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 122 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 880M has 62% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 880M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 880M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and GeForce GTX 880M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 576 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 880M.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 880M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and GeForce GTX 880M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and GeForce GTX 880M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 74% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 97% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce GTX 880M | |
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | TU117 | N15E-GX-A2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | no data | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 954 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 993 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 127.1 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 96 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |