GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 1230 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 633% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 609% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 207% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 628% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 400% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 553% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 326% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 462% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 690% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | Turing | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | TU117 | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | no data | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 570
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla M6
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon RX 570
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Tesla M6
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon HD 7770M
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2