GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Quadro 7000
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro 7000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Ti will be the best choice, for others Quadro 7000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Quadro 7000
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Quadro 7000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- Quadro 7000 has 172% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 7000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Quadro 7000 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 879 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Quadro 7000 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Quadro 7000 is 19 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 4596 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 118% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 118% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro 7000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro 7000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 108% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 95% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 115% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 123% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Quadro 7000 | |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | GF110 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | no data | 2 May 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 651 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 41.66 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | 248 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 3404 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |