GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Quadro M4000M
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro M4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro M4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Quadro M4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M4000M has 33% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 555 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000M.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 2988 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 7% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | − | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro M4000M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Quadro M4000M | |
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
Code name | TU117 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | no data | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1,280 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 975 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1013 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 78.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |