GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Quadro M5000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro M5000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Ti will be the best choice, for others Quadro M5000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Quadro M5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M5000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Quadro M5000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M5000M has 33% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Quadro M5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Quadro M5000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 568 MHz higher, than Quadro M5000M.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Quadro M5000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro M5000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than Quadro M5000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than Quadro M5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro M5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Quadro M5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro M5000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro M5000M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than Quadro M5000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 7% more, than Quadro M5000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Quadro M5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Quadro M5000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Quadro M5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro M5000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Quadro M5000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Quadro M5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than Quadro M5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | − | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro M5000M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Quadro M5000M | |
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
Code name | TU117 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | no data | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1,536 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 962 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1051 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 93.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 366 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 570
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla M6
- Quadro M5000M vs Radeon RX 570
- Quadro M5000M vs Tesla M6
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile