GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon Pro 555
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon Pro 555 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Ti will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 555 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon Pro 555 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 675 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 2920 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 136% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 47% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 108% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 86% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 148% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon Pro 555 | |
| Architecture | Turing | Polaris |
| Code name | TU117 | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | no data | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 40.80 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |