GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Ti will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 5600 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 59% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 54% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 54% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 56% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 68% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 67% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
| Architecture | Turing | Vega |
| Code name | TU117 | Vega Mobile |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | no data | 15 November 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1190 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.16 | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 307.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |