GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 3200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 15% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 448 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 2000 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 191% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 141% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 187% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 133% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 204% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Architecture | Turing | Polaris |
Code name | TU117 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | no data | 26 September 2019 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.44 | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |