GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon R8 M365DX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R8 M365DX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R8 M365DX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Radeon R8 M365DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R8 M365DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R8 M365DX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R8 M365DX uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon R8 M365DX - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R8 M365DX - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 810 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R8 M365DX - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 7200 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6600% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 692% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 786% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN |
| Code name | TU117 | Meso |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | no data | 3 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 720 / 1125 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.00 | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 800 / 1000 MHz |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |