GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon R9 370
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 370, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 370 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Radeon R9 370
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
- Radeon R9 370 has 46% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 605 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 370.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 8 mm longer, than Radeon R9 370.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 2400 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than Radeon R9 370. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than Radeon R9 370. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon R9 370. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than Radeon R9 370. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 7% more, than Radeon R9 370. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 370. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Radeon R9 370. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Radeon R9 370. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Radeon R9 370. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than Radeon R9 370. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | − | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon R9 370. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Trinidad |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | no data | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 975 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 78.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | 221 mm |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |