GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon R9 M270X

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 M270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Ti will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Radeon R9 M270X

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon R9 M270X
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs

Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 805 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 6875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	6−7
ultra / 1080p	24−27	4−5
QHD / 1440p	20−22	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−12	−
low / 720p	65−70	16−18
medium / 1080p	45−50	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 388% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p	60−65	10−12
ultra / 1080p	50−55	10−11
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	20−22	−
low / 720p	110−120	24−27
medium / 1080p	65−70	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 393% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	250−260	130−140
medium / 768p	220−230	100−110
ultra / 1080p	190−200	50−55
QHD / 1440p	120−130	27−30
4K / 2160p	75−80	27−30
high / 768p	210−220	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	120−130	75−80
medium / 768p	110−120	55−60
ultra / 1080p	100−110	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p	50−55	8−9
ultra / 1080p	45−50	7−8
QHD / 1440p	30−35	−
4K / 2160p	16−18	3−4
low / 720p	85−90	18−20
medium / 1080p	50−55	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 466% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p	65−70	14−16
ultra / 1080p	50−55	10−11
QHD / 1440p	30−35	−
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	190−200	60−65
medium / 1080p	120−130	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 307% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p	65−70	12−14
ultra / 1080p	50−55	10−12
QHD / 1440p	35−40	1−2
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	110−120	24−27
medium / 1080p	70−75	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 475% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	140−150	50−55
medium / 768p	130−140	45−50
high / 1080p	75−80	12−14
ultra / 1080p	35−40	6−7
QHD / 1440p	24−27	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p	27−30	4−5
ultra / 1080p	21−24	3−4
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	10−11	0−1
low / 720p	75−80	12−14
medium / 1080p	35−40	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 583% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	130−140	90−95
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	120−130	90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	7−8
QHD / 1440p	12−14	0−1
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	70−75	10−12
medium / 1080p	40−45	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 388% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	140−150	24−27
medium / 768p	90−95	16−18
high / 1080p	50−55	9−10
ultra / 1080p	27−30	6−7
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 464% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	60−65	40−45
ultra / 1080p	55−60	18−20
high / 768p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon R9 M270X
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Code name	TU117	Venus
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	no data	21 March 2014
Pipelines	1024	640
Core clock speed	1530 MHz	725 MHz
Boost Clock	1725 MHz	775 MHz
Transistor count	4,700 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate		31.00
Floating-point performance		1,536 gflops
Length	229 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth		72 GB/s
DirectX	12_1
Shader Model		5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL		Not Listed
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0 x16
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		10

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon R9 M270X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares