GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon R9 M280X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 M280X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 M280X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Radeon R9 M280X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M280X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M280X here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M280X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 M280X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 630 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M280X.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M280X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 780% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 722% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 920% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 452% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 292% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 840% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 528% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 737% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN |
| Code name | TU117 | Saturn XT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | no data | 1 February 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 61.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12_1 | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | Not Listed | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |