GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon R9 M385X
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 M385X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 M385X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Radeon R9 M385X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R9 M385X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 M385X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 430 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385X.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M385X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 6500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 119% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 363% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 254% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 331% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 188% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 346% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R9 M385X | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN |
Code name | TU117 | Strato-XT-M3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | no data | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 61.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12_1 | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |