GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Ti will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 94% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 96% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 92% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 74% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 103% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Architecture | Turing | Vega |
Code name | TU117 | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | no data | 7 January 2020 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1750 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12_1 | DirectX 12_1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 570
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla M6
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Radeon RX 570
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Tesla M6
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 780M
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 780M