GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla C2050
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2050 has 217% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 956 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Tesla C2050 is 19 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 5000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 118% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 118% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 108% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 95% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 109% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 123% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Code name | TU117 | GF100 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | no data | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | 248 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |