GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Ti will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2070 has 217% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 956 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Tesla C2070 is 19 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 5012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 129% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 136% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 128% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 104% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 169% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 139% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Code name | TU117 | GF100 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | no data | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | 248 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |