GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 956 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Tesla M2070 Q is 19 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 4868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 633% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 572% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 163% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 750% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 347% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 533% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 290% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 840% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 55% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 471% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 644% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Code name | TU117 | GF100 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | no data | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | 248 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |