GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
When choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
200 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire has 166% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650.
GeForce GTX 1650 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 1650 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire - with GCN.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 is 635 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 is 3200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
40−45
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
24−27
QHD / 1440p
20−22
18−20
4K / 2160p
10−12
10−11
low / 720p
65−70
60−65
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
55−60
50−55
QHD / 1440p
40−45
35−40
4K / 2160p
20−22
18−20
low / 720p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
70−75
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 in Battlefield 5 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
250−260
medium / 768p
220−230
220−230
ultra / 1080p
190−200
180−190
QHD / 1440p
120−130
110−120
4K / 2160p
75−80
70−75
high / 768p
210−220
210−220
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
100−110
GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
30−35
30−33
4K / 2160p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
85−90
85−90
medium / 1080p
50−55
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 in Far Cry 5 is 2% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
30−35
30−33
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
low / 720p
190−200
180−190
medium / 1080p
120−130
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 in Fortnite is 3% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
35−40
30−35
4K / 2160p
24−27
24−27
low / 720p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
70−75
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 3% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
140−150
140−150
medium / 768p
130−140
130−140
high / 1080p
75−80
75−80
ultra / 1080p
35−40
30−35
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 1% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
27−30
24−27
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
10−11
9−10
low / 720p
75−80
70−75
medium / 1080p
35−40
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 in Metro Exodus is 3% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
130−140
130−140
medium / 1080p
120−130
120−130
GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
110−120
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
high / 1080p
27−30
24−27
ultra / 1080p
18−20
16−18
QHD / 1440p
12−14
10−12
4K / 2160p
8−9
8−9
low / 720p
75−80
70−75
medium / 1080p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
140−150
130−140
medium / 768p
95−100
85−90
high / 1080p
50−55
50−55
ultra / 1080p
27−30
27−30
4K / 2160p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Architecture
Turing
GCN
Code name
TU117
Neptune CF
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
23 April 2019
1 May 2012
Pipelines
896
2560
Core clock speed
1485 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
900 MHz
Transistor count
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
93.24
Length
229 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed
8000 MHz
4800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
128.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0
Shader Model
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
