GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile or Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
50−55
20−22
ultra / 1080p
35−40
12−14
QHD / 1440p
27−30
6−7
4K / 2160p
16−18
5−6
low / 720p
80−85
35−40
medium / 1080p
60−65
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 155% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000.
high / 1080p
80−85
30−35
ultra / 1080p
70−75
27−30
QHD / 1440p
55−60
10−12
4K / 2160p
30−33
7−8
low / 720p
130−140
65−70
medium / 1080p
90−95
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Battlefield 5 is 160% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile.
low / 768p
250−260
230−240
medium / 768p
230−240
200−210
ultra / 1080p
−
110−120
QHD / 1440p
150−160
85−90
4K / 2160p
100−110
45−50
high / 768p
220−230
160−170
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
50−55
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
110−120
80−85
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Dota 2 is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000.
high / 1080p
65−70
24−27
ultra / 1080p
60−65
21−24
QHD / 1440p
40−45
18−20
4K / 2160p
21−24
7−8
low / 720p
100−110
50−55
medium / 1080p
70−75
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Far Cry 5 is 148% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000.
high / 1080p
95−100
30−35
ultra / 1080p
75−80
24−27
QHD / 1440p
45−50
14−16
4K / 2160p
21−24
−
low / 720p
220−230
120−130
medium / 1080p
150−160
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Fortnite is 122% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000.
high / 1080p
85−90
30−35
ultra / 1080p
70−75
24−27
QHD / 1440p
50−55
12−14
4K / 2160p
35−40
12−14
low / 720p
140−150
65−70
medium / 1080p
95−100
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 164% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000.
low / 768p
160−170
100−110
medium / 768p
150−160
90−95
high / 1080p
100−110
40−45
ultra / 1080p
50−55
16−18
QHD / 1440p
40−45
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000.
high / 1080p
40−45
12−14
ultra / 1080p
30−35
10−11
QHD / 1440p
24−27
10−11
4K / 2160p
14−16
2−3
low / 720p
95−100
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Metro Exodus is 181% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
55−60
14−16
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
120−130
70−75
medium / 1080p
90−95
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 160% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000.
high / 1080p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
10−11
QHD / 1440p
18−20
1−2
4K / 2160p
12−14
1−2
low / 720p
95−100
35−40
medium / 1080p
55−60
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 192% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000.
low / 768p
190−200
70−75
medium / 768p
130−140
45−50
high / 1080p
75−80
24−27
ultra / 1080p
40−45
14−16
4K / 2160p
27−30
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 187% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000.
low / 768p
130−140
90−95
medium / 768p
−
60−65
ultra / 1080p
65−70
40−45
high / 768p
−
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
Architecture
Turing
Vega
Code name
N18E-G0
Vega Raven Ridge
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
23 April 2019
7 January 2020
Pipelines
1536
512
Core clock speed
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1750 MHz
Transistor count
6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
7 nm
Texture fill rate
152.6
Memory bus width
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
288.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
