GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs Tesla C2050
When choosing between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile and Tesla C2050.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile has 3 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is 881 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is 9000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 187% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Battlefield 5 is 188% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 230−240 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Far Cry 5 is 169% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 720p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Fortnite is 150% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 720p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 116% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Metro Exodus is 226% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Minecraft is 8% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 170% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 216% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Code name | N18E-G0 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 23 April 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 152.6 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
- Tesla C2050 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
- Tesla C2050 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M