GeForce GT 750M vs GeForce GTX 260
In this comparison between GeForce GT 750M and GeForce GTX 260 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 750M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 260 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 750M
GeForce GTX 260
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
182 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
896 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 has 264% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
GeForce GT 750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 260 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 260 has 892 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M.
GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 260 - in Desktops.
GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 260 - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 275 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 260 - by 65 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 1001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
5−6
3−4
ultra / 1080p
2−3
1−2
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
14−16
medium / 1080p
7−8
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
10−11
7−8
ultra / 1080p
8−9
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
20−22
medium / 1080p
10−12
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Battlefield 5 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GT 750M and GeForce GTX 260 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
95−100
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
27−30
24−27
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
high / 768p
80−85
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
50−55
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 750M.
low / 768p
80−85
75−80
medium / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
4−5
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
4K / 2160p
5−6
1−2
low / 720p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
8−9
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
12−14
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
60−65
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
GeForce GT 750M and GeForce GTX 260 have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p
10−11
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
12−14
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
10−12
9−10
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
medium / 720p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
3−4
2−3
ultra / 1080p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
8−9
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
high / 1080p
−
65−70
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−11
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce GT 750M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
7−8
medium / 1080p
9−10
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
21−24
18−20
medium / 768p
14−16
12−14
high / 1080p
6−7
6−7
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
4K / 2160p
3−4
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
75−80
70−75
medium / 768p
40−45
35−40
ultra / 1080p
18−20
16−18
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 750M
GeForce GTX 260
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Code name
N14P-GT
GT200
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
1 April 2013
16 June 2008
Pipelines
384
192
Core clock speed
967 MHz
1242 MHz
Boost Clock
967 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
65 nm
Texture fill rate
30.94
36.9 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
742.7 gflops
476.9 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
448 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 - 5000 MHz
999 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.19 GB/s
111.9 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 API
11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model
5.1
4.0
OpenGL
4.5
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
192
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
30 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Standard memory configuration
DDR3/GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price
