GeForce GTX 260 vs GeForce GTX 465
When comparing GeForce GTX 260 and GeForce GTX 465, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 260 and GeForce GTX 465 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GTX 465
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
200 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
1 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 9% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 260.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 260 has 895 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 465 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 27 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 465 - by 40 nm process technology.
GeForce GTX 260 is 1 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 465.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 604 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
14−16
ultra / 1080p
1−2
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
30−33
medium / 1080p
5−6
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
20−22
50−55
medium / 1080p
8−9
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 260 and GeForce GTX 465 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
200−210
medium / 768p
95−100
170−180
ultra / 1080p
45−50
95−100
QHD / 1440p
24−27
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
70−75
130−140
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
medium / 768p
55−60
90−95
ultra / 1080p
27−30
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
18−20
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
95−100
medium / 1080p
16−18
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
9−10
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
80−85
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
9−10
27−30
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
2−3
9−10
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
8−9
27−30
medium / 1080p
3−4
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
18−20
50−55
medium / 768p
12−14
30−35
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
100−110
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GTX 465
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Fermi
Code name
GT200
GF100
Type
Desktop
Desktop
Release date
16 June 2008
31 May 2010
Pipelines
192
352
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
1215 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
26.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
855.4 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
102.6 GB/s
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
192
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
+
Multi monitor support
+
+
HDMI
+
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
64 Mh/s
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price
