GeForce GTX 260 vs GeForce GTX 670M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 260 and GeForce GTX 670M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 260 and GeForce GTX 670M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GTX 670M
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
3 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 has 142% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
GeForce GTX 260 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 670M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 260 has 893 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
GeForce GTX 260 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670M - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 644 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 670M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 670M is 501 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
8−9
ultra / 1080p
1−2
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
18−20
medium / 1080p
5−6
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
27−30
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
120−130
150−160
medium / 768p
95−100
120−130
ultra / 1080p
45−50
60−65
QHD / 1440p
24−27
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
70−75
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
27−30
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
4−5
10−11
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
4K / 2160p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
21−24
medium / 1080p
5−6
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
55−60
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
9−10
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
2−3
5−6
ultra / 1080p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
8−9
14−16
medium / 1080p
3−4
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
high / 1080p
65−70
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
18−20
30−33
medium / 768p
12−14
18−20
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
45−50
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
high / 768p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GTX 670M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Fermi
Code name
GT200
N13E-GS1-LP
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
16 June 2008
22 March 2012
Pipelines
192
336
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
598 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
33.5 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
803.7 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
192bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
72.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 API
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
192
336
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Up to 2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
53 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
