GeForce GTX 260 vs GeForce GTX 965M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 260 and GeForce GTX 965M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 260 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 965M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GTX 965M
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 965M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 260 has 892 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 965M.
GeForce GTX 260 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 965M - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 965M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 298 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 965M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 1501 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
20−22
ultra / 1080p
1−2
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
20−22
65−70
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 310% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
120−130
230−240
medium / 768p
95−100
200−210
ultra / 1080p
45−50
110−120
QHD / 1440p
24−27
85−90
4K / 2160p
−
45−50
high / 768p
70−75
160−170
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
50−55
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
27−30
75−80
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
4−5
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
low / 720p
14−16
50−55
medium / 1080p
5−6
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
120−130
medium / 1080p
16−18
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 184% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
21−24
65−70
medium / 1080p
9−10
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 263% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
100−110
medium / 768p
−
90−95
high / 1080p
9−10
40−45
ultra / 1080p
3−4
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
2−3
12−14
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
8−9
40−45
medium / 1080p
3−4
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
7−8
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
18−20
70−75
medium / 768p
12−14
45−50
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 312% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
40−45
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GTX 965M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Maxwell
Code name
GT200
N16E-GS, N16E-GR
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
16 June 2008
5 January 2015
Pipelines
192
1024
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
944 MHz
Boost Clock
950 / 1151 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
73.60
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
2,355 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
G-SYNC support
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
192
1024
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
226 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
GameStream
+
GeForce ShadowPlay
+
GPU Boost
2.0
GameWorks
+
BatteryBoost
+
Check Price
Check Price