GeForce GTX 260 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
When choosing between GeForce GTX 260 and Iris Plus Graphics 650, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 260 and Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
32 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 has 1113% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GTX 260 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
GeForce GTX 260 has 864 GB more memory, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GTX 260 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 942 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
8−9
ultra / 1080p
1−2
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
18−20
medium / 1080p
5−6
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
30−33
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
120−130
150−160
medium / 768p
95−100
120−130
ultra / 1080p
45−50
60−65
QHD / 1440p
24−27
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
70−75
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
27−30
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
4−5
10−11
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
4K / 2160p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
21−24
medium / 1080p
5−6
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
60−65
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
9−10
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
2−3
5−6
ultra / 1080p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
8−9
14−16
medium / 1080p
3−4
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
high / 1080p
65−70
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
18−20
30−35
medium / 768p
12−14
20−22
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
45−50
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
high / 768p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
GT200
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
16 June 2008
3 January 2017
Pipelines
192
48
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
55.20
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
883 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
192
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
