GeForce GTX 260 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
When comparing GeForce GTX 260 and Iris Plus Graphics 655, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 260 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 has 1113% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTX 260 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
GeForce GTX 260 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 942 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
12−14
ultra / 1080p
1−2
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
27−30
medium / 1080p
5−6
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 260 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
190−200
medium / 768p
95−100
160−170
ultra / 1080p
45−50
85−90
QHD / 1440p
24−27
45−50
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
70−75
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
medium / 768p
55−60
85−90
ultra / 1080p
27−30
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
4−5
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
4K / 2160p
1−2
5−6
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
85−90
medium / 1080p
16−18
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
9−10
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 154% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
75−80
medium / 768p
−
65−70
high / 1080p
9−10
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
2−3
8−9
ultra / 1080p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
8−9
24−27
medium / 1080p
3−4
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
65−70
−
ultra / 1080p
−
95−100
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
18−20
45−50
medium / 768p
12−14
27−30
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
GT200
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
16 June 2008
1 September 2017
Pipelines
192
48
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
50.40
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
192
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price