GeForce GTX 260 vs Quadro 2000M
When comparing GeForce GTX 260 and Quadro 2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 260 and Quadro 2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Quadro 2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 has 230% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
GeForce GTX 260 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 260 has 894 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
GeForce GTX 260 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 692 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 99 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
0−1
ultra / 1080p
1−2
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
1−2
medium / 1080p
5−6
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
120−130
60−65
medium / 768p
95−100
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
7−8
QHD / 1440p
24−27
−
high / 768p
70−75
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
ultra / 1080p
20−22
0−1
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
75−80
45−50
medium / 768p
55−60
10−11
ultra / 1080p
27−30
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
4−5
−
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
14−16
0−1
medium / 1080p
5−6
−
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
55−60
21−24
medium / 1080p
16−18
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
7−8
0−1
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
0−1
medium / 1080p
9−10
0−1
low / 768p
45−50
18−20
high / 1080p
9−10
0−1
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
−
ultra / 1080p
0−1
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
8−9
0−1
medium / 1080p
3−4
−
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
high / 1080p
65−70
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Minecraft is 45% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 720p
27−30
8−9
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
7−8
0−1
low / 768p
18−20
0−1
medium / 768p
12−14
−
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 768p
70−75
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
0−1
high / 768p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Quadro 2000M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Fermi
Code name
GT200
Fermi
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
16 June 2008
22 February 2011
Pipelines
192
192
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
550 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
17.60
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
422.4 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
2.1
CUDA cores
192
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price