GeForce GTX 260 vs Quadro K5000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 260 and Quadro K5000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 260 and Quadro K5000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Quadro K5000M
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 has 82% more power consumption, than Quadro K5000M.
GeForce GTX 260 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 260 has 892 GB more memory, than Quadro K5000M.
GeForce GTX 260 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K5000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 536 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro K5000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5000M is 2001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
20−22
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Battlefield 5 is 230% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 260 and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
95−100
180−190
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
70−75
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
40−45
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
95−100
ultra / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Dota 2 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
4−5
18−20
ultra / 1080p
3−4
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
40−45
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
20−22
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
9−10
30−35
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−11
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
18−20
55−60
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
20−22
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 237% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
100−110
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Quadro K5000M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Kepler
Code name
GT200
N14E-Q5
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
16 June 2008
1 June 2012
Pipelines
192
1344
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
706 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
67.31
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
1,615 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
96 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
192
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
51 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
