GeForce GTX 260 vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
When choosing between GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
2x2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 has 894 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
GeForce GTX 260 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 562 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 99 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
21−24
ultra / 1080p
1−2
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
14−16
40−45
medium / 1080p
5−6
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
20−22
70−75
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 320% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
120−130
230−240
medium / 768p
95−100
200−210
ultra / 1080p
45−50
120−130
QHD / 1440p
24−27
95−100
4K / 2160p
−
50−55
high / 768p
70−75
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
50−55
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
27−30
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
4−5
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
low / 720p
14−16
50−55
medium / 1080p
5−6
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
120−130
medium / 1080p
16−18
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 184% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
35−40
ultra / 1080p
6−7
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
21−24
70−75
medium / 1080p
9−10
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 309% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
100−110
medium / 768p
−
95−100
high / 1080p
9−10
40−45
ultra / 1080p
3−4
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
2−3
12−14
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
8−9
40−45
medium / 1080p
3−4
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
7−8
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 283% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
18−20
75−80
medium / 768p
12−14
45−50
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 325% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
40−45
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Terascale 2
Code name
GT200
Blackcomb XT
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
16 June 2008
6 January 2011
Pipelines
192
1920
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
680 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
2x1700 Million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Shader Model
4.0
OpenGL
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
192
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
