GeForce GTX 260 vs Radeon Pro 5500M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon Pro 5500M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 260 stacks up against Radeon Pro 5500M, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro 5500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5500M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Radeon Pro 5500M
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
85 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
8 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5500M.
GeForce GTX 260 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 260 has 888 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 5500M.
GeForce GTX 260 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5500M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 5500M - with Navi / RDNA.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5500M is 11001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
35−40
ultra / 1080p
1−2
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
55−60
ultra / 1080p
6−7
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
20−22
100−110
medium / 1080p
8−9
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
95−100
220−230
ultra / 1080p
45−50
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
70−75
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
27−30
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Dota 2 is 112% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
4−5
45−50
ultra / 1080p
3−4
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
1−2
14−16
low / 720p
14−16
80−85
medium / 1080p
5−6
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
55−60
180−190
medium / 1080p
16−18
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Fortnite is 357% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
60−65
ultra / 1080p
6−7
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
9−10
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
9−10
70−75
ultra / 1080p
3−4
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
3−4
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
7−8
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
18−20
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
6−7
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
4K / 2160p
1−2
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Radeon Pro 5500M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Navi / RDNA
Code name
GT200
Navi 14
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
16 June 2008
13 November 2019
Pipelines
192
1536
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
7 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
139.2
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.0
6.5
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
192
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price