GeForce GTX 260 vs Tesla C2075
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 260 and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 260 stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
6 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 35% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 260.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 260 has 890 GB more memory, than Tesla C2075.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 668 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 238 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 260.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 2133 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
20−22
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
95−100
190−200
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
70−75
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
27−30
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 152% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 227% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
9−10
30−35
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
18−20
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GT200
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
16 June 2008
25 July 2011
Pipelines
192
448
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
32.14
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
248 mm
Memory bus width
448 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
2.0
CUDA cores
192
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
