FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
When choosing between FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 260M SLI, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
FirePro W5100
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 200% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 260M SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 260M SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 380 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 260M SLI - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 5050 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 260M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | G9x |
Code name | Bonaire | NB9E-GTX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 2 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 768 | 224 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 550 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1508 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 950 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |