FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 260M SLI. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 260M SLI. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 260M SLI - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 260M SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 275 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 260M SLI - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 3650 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 260M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | G9x |
Code name | Cypress | NB9E-GTX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 2 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 224 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 550 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1508 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 950 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon R9 M375X
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce MX230
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon R9 M375X
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GeForce MX230