GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GeForce GTX 950A
When comparing GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GeForce GTX 950A, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GeForce GTX 950A is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 950A
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GeForce GTX 950A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 950A.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GeForce GTX 950A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 950A - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce GTX 950A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 443 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 950A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 1052 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GeForce GTX 950A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Fortnite is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GeForce GTX 950A | |
Architecture | G9x | Maxwell |
Code name | NB9E-GTX | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 13 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 224 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 993 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 32.03 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon R9 M375X
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GeForce MX230
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M375X
- GeForce GTX 950A vs GeForce MX230
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU