GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GRID K520
When comparing GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GRID K520, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GRID K520 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K520
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GRID K520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 195 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 4050 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GRID K520 | |
Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
Code name | NB9E-GTX | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 224 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |