GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GRID M10 8Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GRID M10 8Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GRID M10 8Q.
GRID M10 8Q
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 483 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID M10 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 4250 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Architecture | G9x | Maxwell |
| Code name | NB9E-GTX | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 224 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |