GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GRID M6 8Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GRID M6 8Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GRID M6 8Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M6 8Q
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GRID M6 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 50% more power consumption, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID M6 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 172 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID M6 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 4062 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GRID M6 8Q | |
| Architecture | G9x | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | NB9E-GTX | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 224 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 722 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |