GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Quadro M2000M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Quadro M2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Quadro M2000M.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Quadro M2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Quadro M2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI or Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Quadro M2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 488 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 4050 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
150−160
220−230
medium / 768p
130−140
190−200
ultra / 1080p
65−70
110−120
QHD / 1440p
35−40
70−75
4K / 2160p
27−30
40−45
high / 768p
95−100
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
65−70
100−110
ultra / 1080p
40−45
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
7−8
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−12
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
110−120
medium / 1080p
30−33
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−12
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
60−65
95−100
medium / 768p
50−55
85−90
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
30−35
65−70
medium / 768p
21−24
40−45
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Quadro M2000M
Architecture
G9x
Maxwell
Code name
NB9E-GTX
GM107
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 March 2009
2 October 2015
Pipelines
224
640
Core clock speed
550 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1197 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
43.92
Floating-point performance
1,405 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
950 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12
Shader Model
5.0
OpenGL
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
173 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price