GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon HD 4830
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon HD 4830. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon HD 4830. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 4830
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4830.
- Radeon HD 4830 has 510 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4830 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon HD 4830 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4830 is 25 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon HD 4830 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4830 is 850 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4830 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 60% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4830 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Dota 2 is 47% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Fortnite is 105% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in World of Tanks is 43% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Architecture | G9x | TeraScale |
| Code name | NB9E-GTX | RV770 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 21 October 2008 |
| Pipelines | 224 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 736.0 gflops | |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |