GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon HD 4870 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 260M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4870 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 286 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 90% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 150 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon HD 4870 X2 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 2650 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Fortnite is 32% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Architecture | G9x | TeraScale |
Code name | NB9E-GTX | R700 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 12 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 224 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 700 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 28.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,120.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon R9 M375X
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GeForce MX230
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon R9 M375X
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs GeForce MX230
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon R7 M465
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon R7 M465