GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 260M SLI stacks up against Radeon Pro Vega 16, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type
GDDR3
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 1450 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 163% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
30−35
75−80
medium / 1080p
16−18
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 147% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
150−160
240−250
medium / 768p
130−140
210−220
ultra / 1080p
65−70
130−140
QHD / 1440p
35−40
100−110
4K / 2160p
27−30
60−65
high / 768p
95−100
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
10−11
30−33
ultra / 1080p
9−10
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
4−5
9−10
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−33
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
low / 720p
70−75
130−140
medium / 1080p
30−33
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 115% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
40−45
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
3−4
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 720p
30−35
75−80
medium / 1080p
16−18
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 168% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
60−65
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
100−110
high / 1080p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
8−9
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
30−35
85−90
medium / 768p
21−24
55−60
high / 1080p
10−12
30−33
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
4K / 2160p
6−7
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
G9x
Vega
Code name
NB9E-GTX
Vega Mobile
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 March 2009
15 November 2018
Pipelines
224
1024
Core clock speed
550 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
76.16
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
950 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
Laptop size
large
large
Check Price
Check Price