GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon PRO WX 2100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI or Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 328% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 5050 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
7−8
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−12
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
140−150
medium / 768p
130−140
110−120
ultra / 1080p
65−70
55−60
QHD / 1440p
35−40
30−35
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
95−100
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
medium / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
10−11
9−10
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−12
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
low / 720p
70−75
65−70
medium / 1080p
30−33
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Fortnite is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
medium / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
6−7
5−6
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
14−16
medium / 1080p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
95−100
90−95
ultra / 1080p
85−90
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
30−35
27−30
medium / 768p
21−24
18−20
high / 1080p
10−12
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
high / 768p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
G9x
Polaris
Code name
NB9E-GTX
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 March 2009
21 March 2018
Pipelines
224
512
Core clock speed
550 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
39.01
Floating-point performance
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
950 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
large
large
Check Price
Check Price
