GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon Pro WX 7100
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon Pro WX 7100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 260M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 7100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
130 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
8 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 15% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 7100.
Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro WX 7100 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 7100 - with Polaris.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 7100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 7100 is 6050 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
20−22
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−12
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 290% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
30−35
110−120
medium / 1080p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Battlefield 5 is 284% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
150−160
250−260
medium / 768p
130−140
220−230
ultra / 1080p
65−70
180−190
QHD / 1440p
35−40
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
95−100
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
9−10
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
24−27
85−90
medium / 1080p
10−12
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Far Cry 5 is 316% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
50−55
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
70−75
180−190
medium / 1080p
30−33
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Fortnite is 221% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
3−4
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
30−35
110−120
medium / 1080p
16−18
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 318% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
60−65
140−150
medium / 768p
50−55
130−140
high / 1080p
16−18
75−80
ultra / 1080p
8−9
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
6−7
27−30
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
9−10
low / 720p
16−18
70−75
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Metro Exodus is 385% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Minecraft is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
16−18
70−75
medium / 1080p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
30−35
130−140
medium / 768p
21−24
90−95
high / 1080p
10−12
50−55
ultra / 1080p
7−8
27−30
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 306% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
55−60
high / 768p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Architecture
G9x
Polaris
Code name
NB9E-GTX
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
2 March 2009
1 March 2017
Pipelines
224
2304
Core clock speed
550 MHz
Boost Clock
1243 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
179.0
Floating-point performance
5,728 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
950 MHz
7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
224.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
567 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
