GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI or Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
IGP
Memory type
GDDR3
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 130% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL.
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - with Vega.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is 381 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is 450 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
20−22
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−12
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 272% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
150−160
250−260
medium / 768p
130−140
220−230
ultra / 1080p
65−70
180−190
QHD / 1440p
35−40
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
95−100
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
9−10
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
80−85
medium / 1080p
10−12
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
70−75
180−190
medium / 1080p
30−33
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 209% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
3−4
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
60−65
140−150
medium / 768p
50−55
120−130
high / 1080p
16−18
70−75
ultra / 1080p
8−9
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 165% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
low / 720p
16−18
65−70
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 342% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
16−18
65−70
medium / 1080p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
30−35
130−140
medium / 768p
21−24
85−90
high / 1080p
10−12
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
50−55
high / 768p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Architecture
G9x
Vega
Code name
NB9E-GTX
Vega Kaby Lake-G
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 March 2009
7 January 2018
Pipelines
224
1280
Core clock speed
550 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
80.88
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
950 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price