GeForce GTX 275 vs GRID K160Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 275 and GRID K160Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and GRID K160Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
GRID K160Q
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
130 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
1 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 has 68% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 895 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 554 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 648 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
0−1
ultra / 1080p
4−5
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
9−10
medium / 1080p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
10−12
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
8−9
medium / 1080p
12−14
2−3
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
130−140
100−110
medium / 768p
100−110
75−80
ultra / 1080p
50−55
30−35
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
9−10
high / 768p
75−80
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
10−12
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
65−70
medium / 768p
55−60
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Dota 2 is 37% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
8−9
0−1
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
6−7
medium / 1080p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
60−65
40−45
medium / 1080p
21−24
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Fortnite is 82% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
10−12
medium / 1080p
12−14
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Forza Horizon 4 is 171% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
50−55
35−40
medium / 768p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
4−5
0−1
ultra / 1080p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
6−7
−
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
high / 1080p
85−90
50−55
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
30−35
21−24
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
1−2
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1000% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
24−27
3−4
medium / 768p
16−18
−
high / 1080p
9−10
2−3
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 466% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
85−90
65−70
medium / 768p
40−45
30−35
ultra / 1080p
18−20
10−11
high / 768p
35−40
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GRID K160Q.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
GRID K160Q
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Kepler
Code name
GT200B
GK107
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
15 January 2009
28 June 2013
Pipelines
240
192
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
850 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
13.60
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
326.4 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
28.51 GB/s
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
3.0
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
3.0
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Check Price
