GeForce GTX 275 vs GRID K260Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and GRID K260Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 275 and GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
GRID K260Q
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
GRID K260Q has 2% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 275.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 894 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 659 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3866 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
10−12
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
24−27
50−55
medium / 1080p
12−14
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 275 and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
210−220
medium / 768p
100−110
180−190
ultra / 1080p
50−55
95−100
QHD / 1440p
27−30
50−55
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
75−80
140−150
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
90−95
ultra / 1080p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
8−9
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
60−65
95−100
medium / 1080p
21−24
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
20−22
QHD / 1440p
1−2
9−10
low / 720p
24−27
50−55
medium / 1080p
12−14
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
50−55
85−90
medium / 768p
45−50
75−80
high / 1080p
12−14
30−33
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
4−5
9−10
ultra / 1080p
3−4
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
27−30
medium / 1080p
6−7
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
100−110
medium / 1080p
90−95
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
30−35
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−12
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
24−27
55−60
medium / 768p
16−18
30−35
high / 1080p
9−10
18−20
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
GRID K260Q
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Kepler
Code name
GT200B
GK104
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
15 January 2009
28 June 2013
Pipelines
240
1536
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
95.36
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
2,289 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
3.0
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
3.0
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Check Price
