GeForce GTX 275 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
When comparing GeForce GTX 275 and Iris Pro Graphics P580, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
64 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 has 1360% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 832 GB more memory, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
GeForce GTX 275 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 1054 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
10−11
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
21−24
medium / 1080p
8−9
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
10−12
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 275 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
170−180
medium / 768p
100−110
140−150
ultra / 1080p
50−55
70−75
QHD / 1440p
27−30
40−45
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
75−80
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
75−80
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
8−9
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
8−9
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
low / 720p
60−65
75−80
medium / 1080p
21−24
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
50−55
65−70
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
4−5
6−7
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
18−20
medium / 1080p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
90−95
medium / 1080p
90−95
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−12
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
24−27
35−40
medium / 768p
16−18
21−24
high / 1080p
9−10
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
50−55
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
high / 768p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Gen. 9 Skylake
Code name
GT200B
Skylake GT4e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
15 January 2009
1 September 2015
Pipelines
240
72
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
350 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
75.60
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
3.0
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.97
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
