GeForce GTX 275 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
When comparing GeForce GTX 275 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 1004 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 188% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
10−12
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 720p
24−27
70−75
medium / 1080p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 206% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
130−140
230−240
medium / 768p
100−110
200−210
ultra / 1080p
50−55
120−130
QHD / 1440p
27−30
100−110
4K / 2160p
27−30
55−60
high / 768p
75−80
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
55−60
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−35
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 98% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
8−9
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
3−4
8−9
low / 720p
18−20
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
60−65
130−140
medium / 1080p
21−24
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−12
27−30
QHD / 1440p
1−2
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
75−80
medium / 1080p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
50−55
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
95−100
high / 1080p
12−14
45−50
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
4−5
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
6−7
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
10−12
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 177% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
24−27
80−85
medium / 768p
16−18
50−55
high / 1080p
9−10
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 221% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
GT200B
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
15 January 2009
15 August 2020
Pipelines
240
96
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
400 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
4.0
OpenGL
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
